2 ms·
"It's interesting how he states he doesn't know what they had, but he can't comment on what they destroyed. It's almost like he's insinuating that they have som
by canistr 15y ago
"It's interesting how he states he doesn't know what they had, but he can't comment on what they destroyed. It's almost like he's insinuating that they have some idea what was destroyed."
You're reading too much into what's he's saying.
- blendergasket 15y agoI find that politicians and PR people use the specific words they use for very specific reasons. In this case they can send a message to people who might want to leak in the future, who might be parsing this stuff really carefully, but not making it obvious enough that the general public sees what's going on. Strategic language is a crazy and complicated game.