> Arguing that generics are in "the basics" is a little disingenuous, don't you think? Not really. Type polymorphism exists since the 70's, it still blows my m

> Arguing that generics are in "the basics" is a little disingenuous, don't you think? Not really. Type polymorphism exists since the 70's, it still blows my mind that people consider that they are ‶too hard to understand for developers″, or that ‶their implementation is not very clear to language designers″. > Go has been wildly successful without generics JS have been wildly successful despite its many fundamental flaws, success is not an indicator of intrinsic quality.