4 ms·
Another "open" move for Android.
by shaggyfrog 15y ago
Another "open" move for Android.
- drivebyacct2 15y agoDid you read the article? My understanding from devs that I follow is that the current feedback system is pretty awful. If they're going to focus on better ways of fostering dev/Market support, that seems like a good thing. (I'm downvoted for saying the same thing the top comment did, before that comment existed? OK? Cool story guys, it's not like the article implies a change in how Google handles these issues in an attempt to handle them better.)
- shaggyfrog 15y agoOf course I read the article. The point is that Google seems to love throwing around the "open" and "closed" buzzwords, irrespective of how much hypocrisy they engage in on a regular basis.
- dpcan 15y agoThere was nothing in the forum post from Google about "improving" anything. They directed us to contact forms that always existed. Just TRY using those contact forms. I haven't tried today, but when I used them in the past, the first thing I received was a canned response that had nothing to do with the problem. I would reply saying that this canned response didn't help and to please actually read my question. About a week later, and this has happened to me over and over again, I would get another response saying they recently changed things in the Android Market that should have solved my problem. Uhm, changed what? Did you read my question? Are you a robot? It's infuriating. If this is all we have now, I won't email either. I already have copies of the responses they send back.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- drivebyacct2 15y agocrickets Keeping hitting that arrow!
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- chc 15y agoFrom the Hacker News guidelines: "Resist complaining about being downmodded. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading." Some people will downvote just for violating that.
- drivebyacct2 15y agoI would honestly appreciate any sort of explanation as to the just massive amount of downvotes I received for this post. Obviously, pointing out the silence wasn't received well earlier and I fear it won't be better now. My reply was relevant and accurate in the context of the article. Further, it's in the exact same vein as the highly popular now-top comment which didn't exist when I wrote this post. The only reply only points out that his email experience was poor in the past. It's obvious that Google wants to shift to one-on-one email support both in the article and the forum post. So why did I get crapped on so badly?