19 ms·
I'm clearly failing to communicate my intent here :) If I don't treat a commit as a meaningful layer of abstraction, then it isn't one. If I say a commit isn't
by preseinger 5y ago
I'm clearly failing to communicate my intent here :) If I don't treat a commit as a meaningful layer of abstraction, then it isn't one. If I say a commit isn't meaningful then it isn't; Git's semantics are secondary to mine. Right? Is this controversial?
- CRConrad 5y agoYes, seems to me it is controversial if you then also complain about not being able to see exactly where -- in which commit -- some breaking change happened. Doesn't that mean commits are actually meaningful to you; why else would that be what you're looking for?
- preseinger 5y agoCommits aren't meaningful to me. Breaking changes are properties of PRs, not commits. But I basically never care about breaking changes, because they shouldn't ever get merged to main. CI should have prevented that outcome.