3 ms·
Yes, I understand that might be a factor. However, this still invalidates the point that whites are the most privileged group. If we take second/third-generati
by postsantum 5y ago
Yes, I understand that might be a factor. However, this still invalidates the point that whites are the most privileged group. If we take second/third-generation indians, they, on average, would be wealthier than most whites. Does this mean they are more privileged? I think yes
- standardUser 5y ago"However, this still invalidates the point that whites are the most privileged group." No one made that point. And yes, it's true, if you look at certain much smaller demographic groups you can find groups that are somewhat more economically advantaged than white men.
- postsantum 5y agoThe only alternative explanation of such wealth difference is that these "white males" are objectively better at it. That's why I mentioned privileges
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]