agreed with you on pre-header, but > having a different from and reply-to is not about what the op is complaining. the offending header is > From: "jimmy@wi

agreed with you on pre-header, but > having a different from and reply-to is not about what the op is complaining. the offending header is > From: "jimmy@wikipedia.org" <donate@wikimedia.org> i.e. the address uses a display-name (in rfc2822 nomenclature) made to look like an unrelated, personal email address. (and the reply-to actually matches from) i wouldn't quite call it abuse but it is certainly deceptive.