4 ms·
It seems to be against the fiduciary duty of Meta the company to encourage a truly open environment where it would be easy to escape their advertising and other
by babyshake 5y ago
It seems to be against the fiduciary duty of Meta the company to encourage a truly open environment where it would be easy to escape their advertising and other modes of generating revenue. As usual, the corporation says one thing while intending to essentially do the opposite.
- simonh 5y agoIt's not against facebook's fiduciary duty to allow you to post links to other sites in facebook, so I don't see why this would be different.
- vineyardmike 5y ago> the fiduciary duty of Meta the company This argument for public comapanies needs to be de-bunked. This isn't a real thing, "fiduciary duty" means don't burn money and don't fraud your investors not don't do a slightly-less-shortterm business decision. Also zuck owns a majority, so even if it was a real thing, if he approves, no other shareholder's opinion on duty matters.