6 ms·
I do exactly this, except I take a time-stamped photo of it and throw the hard copy away. Google docs automatically turns it into a PDF. It increases the Big
by nickthemagicman 5y ago
I do exactly this, except I take a time-stamped photo of it and throw the hard copy away. Google docs automatically turns it into a PDF.
It increases the Big O on capturing it, but reduces space and access complexity.
For long running docs like titles, and certifications, passports, and whatnot I stick in an important papers storage Tupperware so it's safe from water damage
- throwaway744678 5y agoNitpicking (of course, HN, what did you expect): capturing is still O(1).
- nickthemagicman 5y agoHA. True I guess it just adds a constant to capture time . Good catch.
- mjochim 5y agoI would argue that it’s O(n), increasing linearly with number of pages of the document ;-).
- nickthemagicman 5y agoI see where you're coming from and we're probably getting wayyy in the weeds on this...:)....but I think they mean an insert of item into already existing array is O(1) and from your perspective ..traversal over time would be O(n) so I think y'all might both correct from diff perspectives. I was thinking increasing insert time would increase Big O but they made the point that it's a constant which will cancel out as n approaches infinity. God I'm a nerd.