Supports is not a strong enough word for an organization whose founder and chief executive officer previously led the public policy team at Google, or another i

Supports is not a strong enough word for an organization whose founder and chief executive officer previously led the public policy team at Google, or another in which Google is one of three partners. It's not like Google made a donation to an organization that already existed which they happen to agree with. Without Google, these organizations wouldn't exist. Which would all be fine, if Google made that clear when referencing them. When some organization makes a public statement, don't you like to know who financed them?