> Fossil is not competing with anyone. False. This page is proof. https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki https://www.fossil-scm.org/ho

> Fossil is not competing with anyone. False. This page is proof. https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.w... > I’d bet that the only undesired consequence of Git’s existence in their minds is the unfortunate phenomenon of ocasional [sic] Githeads stumping into Fossil’s forums Wrong again, you lost that bet. You owe me a beer. https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/rebaseharm.md https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/rebaseharm.md You need to actually read the Fossil pages first to understand what this argument is even about. You are providing evidence that you’re just attacking me without understanding the history. > I can use hyperbole too. Do you realize that you’re totally validating my whole argument? Because you’re calling my argument hyperbole and a straw man, when I’m accurately describing what Fossil and it’s author have said about git rebase, without realizing it you are agreeing with me and disagreeing with @SQLite. You claimed that my question about rebase being a felony was a straw man, when in fact that’s exactly what @SQLite said literally. You called @SQLite’s idea ridiculous, not mine. You are disagreeing with the core belief that Dr. Hipp holds that modifying code history should be at the level of a criminal offense. I’m upvoting you because you are proving my point.