I mean, it's an article about how a technology is negatively impacting marginalized groups, and cites research that backs those claims. It makes sense to cite

I mean, it's an article about how a technology is negatively impacting marginalized groups, and cites research that backs those claims. It makes sense to cite the groups and practices most impacted by it. You could read the research and refute it, or you could just bluster about things. I know you tried to expand on it in your comment below, but minimizing the specific concerns raised to "isms" and ignoring that at least two of the references in the articles linked and their references for the actual research addressed at least the socioeconomic portion of it, illustrates that you only applied your surface level perspective and criticism.