5 ms·
Indeed, it's a very silly statement. As if the specific requirement was not meant to be taken literally but the metallurgist should abide to it anyways. The me
by aritmo 5y ago
Indeed, it's a very silly statement. As if the specific requirement was not meant to be taken literally but the metallurgist should abide to it anyways.
The metallurgist just wanted to save some $$$ by selling rejected/out-of-specs products.
- Narretz 5y agoThat's a giant leap in logic. She wouldn't even save money, the company would. I doubt this was the only test they did on the steel. It might have been that from her perspective she got the same steel over and over again, and just didn't do the work, because she was lazy.