3 ms·
Seems, like a very interesting idea, but the readme states: > Currently, the only supported architecture and compiler is x86_64 and GCC, respectively Let's wa
by funcDropShadow 5y ago
Seems, like a very interesting idea, but the readme states:
> Currently, the only supported architecture and compiler is x86_64 and GCC, respectively
Let's wait until its architecture-independence has arrived in practice.
- KitCapo 5y agoConsidering that the last commit was 3 years ago.. I'm not so optimistic that we'll ever see it arrive in practice.
- usr1106 5y agoI believe the author stated only a week ago that he has stopped working on it.
- matheusmoreira 5y agoYes. My next step was implementing modern ARM architectures at least so I could compile a version for my phone. I don't have other architectures to test on so I'd need pull requests for them. The Linux kernel nolibc.h already has support and is just better in almost every way. I wasn't sure if there was any point in continuing liblinux after I discovered it since it achieves almost everything I tried to do and doesn't even require a build system, shared libraries or anything. The support for auxiliary values is missing though. Maybe they'd accept a patch...? I also asked Greg on reddit about nolibc.h once: https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/fx5e4v/im_greg_kroahhartman_linux_kernel_developer_ama/fn3rpht/ https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/fx5e4v/im_greg_kroah... Turns out there was a klibc project that never turned up in my original research!