> It mainly fails as a logo in the way a nicely formatted resume fails as a logo: because it’s not a logo. I'm not sure what the difference between a logo and

> It mainly fails as a logo in the way a nicely formatted resume fails as a logo: because it’s not a logo. I'm not sure what the difference between a logo and a seal is (in the context of a digital image representing a brand). But regardless, this article calls it a logo, as does Ive in a direct quote.