4 ms·
>They make your project unreachable, now and in the future (archives). You won't be able to trace the history of your project when you will want to do it. That
by Barrin92 5y ago
>They make your project unreachable, now and in the future (archives). You won't be able to trace the history of your project when you will want to do it.
That has nothing to do with the software being open source or not, it's a question of whether you have a robust archival system in place.
I use open source software for plenty of things but most of it will at some point be lost to the ether because nobody's backing anything up
- kelnos 5y ago> That has nothing to do with the software being open source or not, it's a question of whether you have a robust archival system in place. With Slack, your only option is to pay per user in order to have access to older messages, which is almost certainly going to be cost-prohibitive for most projects. I don't have a source for this, but I believe using a bot that automatically archives conversations elsewhere is against Slack's free-tier ToS. I agree that this doesn't inherently have anything to do with closed vs. open source, but these sorts of shenanigans just aren't possible if you're self-hosting an open source discussion platform.
- WoahNoun 5y agoSelf-hosting has a cost as well. Not sure why you are comparing a free-tier to a non-free option.