So? Wouldn’t people that know the cameras are there drive slower than the people that don’t? From a public safety point of view, known cameras are more effectiv

So? Wouldn’t people that know the cameras are there drive slower than the people that don’t? From a public safety point of view, known cameras are more effective at limiting speed than unknown ones. Reducing lane width is also shown to be a very effective speed control methodology, that does not require police enforcement.[0] Or are you concerned about a loss of local and state revenue? Seriously, the use of police for revenue generation, rather than public safety is an open secret among police and local governments.[1][2][3] [0] https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/street-design-elements/lane-width/ https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/stre... [1] https://harvardlawreview.org/2015/04/policing-and-profit/ https://harvardlawreview.org/2015/04/policing-and-profit/ [2] https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/generating-new-revenue-streams/ https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/generating-new-revenue-s... [3] https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/12/the-benefits-of-fewer-nypd-arrests/384126/ https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/12/the-ben...