5 ms·
I wish they put more effort into round 10 version of C# . Features presented will have minimal impact on productivity and maintainability.
by polskibus 5y ago
I wish they put more effort into round 10 version of C# . Features presented will have minimal impact on productivity and maintainability.
- int_19h 5y agoC# is already evolving fast enough that quite a few devs are uncomfortable with it. Speaking strictly for myself, I love getting new language features faster - but there's a balance to strike here for the overall good of the ecosystem. You don't want to drive out all the people who can't keep up.
- tonicbbleking 5y agoDiscriminated unions is one of those features that everyone talks about, but never gets championed. Wish C# 10 already had this feature. https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/discussions/2962 https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/discussions/2962
- throw868788 5y agoMaybe try F#? I know it isn't always an option but if you can, especially recently, its been quite productive to work in.
- keithnz 5y agoyou can actually do them pretty easily in C# without language support anyways. for instance, the F# example from https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/posts/designing-for-correctness/ https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/posts/designing-for-correc... can be done in C# like https://gist.github.com/keithn/ceeeed5f7eb567e1b2333747065d10dd https://gist.github.com/keithn/ceeeed5f7eb567e1b2333747065d1... almost similar amount of code, however, no exhaustive checking. Not that I find that to be much of a problem, but it would be nice
- Smaug123 5y agoBut who needs sum types when you have the visitor pattern :troll_face: https://blog.ploeh.dk/2018/06/25/visitor-as-a-sum-type/ https://blog.ploeh.dk/2018/06/25/visitor-as-a-sum-type/
- keithnz 5y agowow.....that is one way to do it.....yes. I would hate to think what a system would look like with many sum types in it
- sedatk 5y agoI've been a huge proponent of file-scoped namespaces and it's in C# 10. I think it'll improve code readability and maintainability significantly despite being a seemingly minor change. It's also in line with "minimal API" and "top-level code" changes. I wrote about it here: https://ssg.dev/a-pledge-for-namespace-directives-in-c-15a322504a15 https://ssg.dev/a-pledge-for-namespace-directives-in-c-15a32...
- ulugbek7 5y agoI love C#10 for a few features. The language is developing rapidly. And C# is already productive. I would like to see fewer features in each release.
- oaiey 5y agoStatic interface members enabling generic math and other cool features slipped the C# 10 quality bar. That is why the release looks a bit thin. But honestly, with file scoped namespaces and global usings ... there is enough to see.