> If they tested the feed of course... > ...of course the contaminants are reflected > This is easily verified as basic fact So easy and obvious that you fai

> If they tested the feed of course... > ...of course the contaminants are reflected > This is easily verified as basic fact So easy and obvious that you failed to provide a source. > Conventional red meat can have 20X the amount of glyphosate than your apple can. Is there a reason for that? It seems plausible to me that glyphosate would not survive being cooked and, therefore, a food that is often eaten raw would have different requirements for different types of food. The increased allowable amount is also not indicative that there is actually more in it. It may simply be reflective of an decreased bioavailablity of the substance when delivered via meat, for whatever reason.