22 ms·
Why are you splitting hairs??? They worked as accountants through 2019. So obviously they have knowledge of where the funds were being funneled to.
by starik36 5y ago
Why are you splitting hairs??? They worked as accountants through 2019. So obviously they have knowledge of where the funds were being funneled to.
- ComputerGuru 5y agoNo one is splitting hairs; this is the very crux of the matter. They worked as accountants for a different organization altogether.
- starik36 5y agoGiven that the accountants gave testimony - it would stand to reason they had knowledge of it.
- ComputerGuru 5y agoI know you're arguing from a very partial perspective, but if you'd read the 972mag article it's insanely clear that the accounts' testimony would be thrown out as hearsay in any real court of law. They weren't involved in the supposed activity the other organizations are accused of doing based on their testimony, they didn't see it happen, they just "know" that it happened. But I feel like there is no use continuing to argue this with you, so peace out.
- starik36 5y ago> no use continuing to argue To misquote Capt Picard responding to two parties complaining that they they'll never find common ground: "On the contrary. We've agreed that there is no use continuing to argue".