3 ms·
> They're all things you can do — provably — without social media. People who hold this opinion, when asked to define what counts as social media, will invaria
by tqi 5y ago
> They're all things you can do — provably — without social media.
People who hold this opinion, when asked to define what counts as social media, will invariably draw the line based on "what do I like/dislike." Facebook, Snapchat: social media. HN, WhatsApp: not social media.
- karaterobot 5y agoI'm not making that argument though. What I'm saying is, you can do all of those things (keeping up to date with friends, socializing, finding recipes, etc.) without social media. Indeed, without computers of any kind. The proof is that people did it for thousands of years before social media existed. If the argument is that you can do those things better with social media, my second point was that that hasn't turned out to be the case for many people, particularly when it comes to maintaining meaningful social connections.
- watwut 5y ago> The proof is that people did it for thousands of years before social media existed. That argument does not make sense. For "thousands years", you lived in small one room cabin with kids, grandparents and maybe even sibling there. You socialized, because there was no way to be alone. Good luck finding people now willing to live with you that way. No one will trade letters with you either. They expect you to communicate and socialize at places normal for contemporary society.