4 ms·

I'll second the plausible suggestion that perhaps the name/marketing copy combo isn't as unpredictable as you might think. Corporate speak and company names are

I'll second the plausible suggestion that perhaps the name/marketing copy combo isn't as unpredictable as you might think. Corporate speak and company names are pretty formulaic. Try running the name and <article> through GPT-3 and see what happens (or GPT-2 here: https://bellard.org/textsynth/ https://bellard.org/textsynth/) E.g., I just prompted GPT-2 with a made up company name that doesn't have any google search results and got a completion like this: <p><em>Fully featured webapp for social & mobile networks in the cloud</em></p>

stordoff 5y ago
"The choice is up to you. Will you live your life in a way that’s enjoyable and worth living? Or will you drag out the most mundane and ordinary day of your life and hope that you’ll die some day? [snip a few paragraphs] Kenji.click is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com." It's slightly eerie how good that is (GPT-J 6B). I generated about ten paragraphs, and other then it being a bit rambly, there was basically nothing that would make my question whether it was written by a human. Capping it off with the Amazon Associates disclaimer somehow helped complete the illusion. I did also seemingly walk in on a bunch of AIs arguing: > I just don’t believe it. > It’s gotta be them. > There’s not enough evidence. > There’s just not enough evidence. > It’s gotta be them. > It’s just too far-fetched. > There’s just not enough evidence