> 6. [...] Meanwhile, the developer moves to demolish the property so that it may be redeveloped so they can monetize the land According to court documents fro

> 6. [...] Meanwhile, the developer moves to demolish the property so that it may be redeveloped so they can monetize the land According to court documents from 2000, the order to demolish the property came from one of the IGR [former] partners, Amaurillo Monteiro de Oliveira. However this part of the court sentence doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If this were true then they wouldn't get away with only paying 100k... I'm trying to find other court documents, or maybe an appeal. > On 05/04/87, the demolition of the building began, by order of the former partner of IGR, AMAURILLO MONTEIRO DE OLIVEIRA, culminating with the almost total destruction of the original building, which left it without a roof, doors or windows, despite the existence of the aforementioned Cesium-137 bomb on the site, without any warnings or notices. [1] https://jus.com.br/jurisprudencia/16292/sentenca-na-acao-civil-publica-no-caso-do-acidente-radioativo-com-cesio-137-em-goiania https://jus.com.br/jurisprudencia/16292/sentenca-na-acao-civ... --- EDIT: On the second page, it is mentioned that only two of the former IGR partners had to pay up: Amaurillo, probably for the reason above, and the nuclear physicist Flamarion Barbosa Goulart. EDIT 2: Ok, so it looks like he was indeed a former partner in IGR. Why he ended up ordering the demolishment, is beyond me. It seems the other IGR partners didn't have to pay anything.