>It's strange how Anne Wojcicki's [...] yet most have never heard of her. It's not strange if you consider that Elizabeth Holmes proactively pursued the media

>It's strange how Anne Wojcicki's [...] yet most have never heard of her. It's not strange if you consider that Elizabeth Holmes proactively pursued the media appearances circuit. E.g. talk shows, award ceremonies, etc. Other female CEOs do more actual work and don't have the time for those distractions. Also, Forbes' calculation of Holmes being worth ~4 billion based on 50% ownership of Theranos drew more media attention. The public fascination with (so-called) "billionaires" feeds the self-reinforcing cycle of more interviews. In contrast, the media didn't calculate Anne Wojcicki to be a billionaire until recently: https://www.forbes.com/sites/leahrosenbaum/2021/06/17/23andmes-anne-wojcicki-becomes-newest-self-made-billionaire-after-spac-deal-with-richard-branson/?sh=334947ac3332 https://www.forbes.com/sites/leahrosenbaum/2021/06/17/23andm...