3 ms·
On the basis of defending "hate speech", according to at least one organization he cofounded[0]: >and in opposition to censorship and corporate control of gove
by twofornone 5y ago
On the basis of defending "hate speech", according to at least one organization he cofounded[0]:
>and in opposition to censorship and corporate control of government
I truly wonder what position he would have taken regarding covid/vaccine censorship. Or reddit's implicit authoritarian policy against criticism of LGB and especially T. He seems like an enough of an idealist to have been a free speech absolutist.
0. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demand_Progress https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demand_Progress
- lez 5y agoIt's no question he is against any kind of censorship.
- rusk 5y agoHe “was” against any kind of censorship. His principles forever frozen in time. I wonder had he lived would his position have softened in the interval. I think many of us have been on this journey.
- vanderZwan 5y agoAs phrased your comment is implying that anyone who isn't a "free speech absolutist" isn't an idealist, which does not sound right to me, but I'll assume that was just an accidental byproduct of brevity. That aside, the type of "censorship and corporate control of government" that was prevalent when Aaron Swartz found that organization had strong ties to the post-9/11 insanity that took over Western politics and media. It was a different situation than the ones that you are describing. I wouldn't make any assumptions about whether he would have judged them the same way.