2 ms·
"They wouldn't sell it unless they were absolutely sure it wouldn't be used against its own people and they have no problem selling to their arch enemies." I d
by hutzlibu 5y ago
"They wouldn't sell it unless they were absolutely sure it wouldn't be used against its own people and they have no problem selling to their arch enemies."
I do not follow that logic.
They do not have to control every instance of their software, to defend against it.
I certainly would not try to hack someone with their own tools. I would just assume they spot it easily and exchange the favour.
- giansegato 5y agoI believe the OP was referring to the state of Israel, more in the sense that Israel wouldn't grant permission to sell a certain technology without being sure it cannot be wielded against its people. I think it's a sound argument, even if speculative.
- hutzlibu 5y agoYou can never be sure with any weapon you made, that it will not be eventually be used against you. But a fine grained hacking tool has a very unique fingerprint and working style, you could defend against much more easier, if it was you who build it all.