3 ms·
I'm finding more and more pieces of information that suggest the Great Stagnation coincides with the institutionalization of science. Science "won", got the re
by radu_floricica 5y ago
I'm finding more and more pieces of information that suggest the Great Stagnation coincides with the institutionalization of science.
Science "won", got the respect of society, and got upgraded to Serious Business, with corresponding stiff roles and certifications. And 60 years later we look around and wonder how we got to tolerate parasitic journals. Assume - a very fair assumption - that journals are just the tip of the iceberg. Just what us laymen see most clearly from the outside. This makes things look pretty bad.
Now, this is pure personal opinion: I think there is about as much chance of reforming academia as it is of making NASA competitive with SpaceX. I doubt a solution will arrive soon, but if it is it will be from somewhere outside the established field.
- phreeza 5y agoI think the great stagnation is widely considered to have taken hold in the mid 70s. Institutionalisation of science has been going on since the 30s at least, if not earlier. It provided inventions massively increasing total factor productivity well into the period of institutionalisation. I think it is much more likely that whatever "disease" is causing the great stagnation is also affecting science.