3 ms·
I've been meaning to try out PhotoStructure[1] for a while now as it looks like it might just be a good place to finally put some effort into organizing my coll
by eredengrin 5y ago
I've been meaning to try out PhotoStructure[1] for a while now as it looks like it might just be a good place to finally put some effort into organizing my collection. Nothing is guaranteed to last forever but it looks like the author is planning ahead in this case such that even if he goes out of business, all the work I put into organizing would not be meaningless (data is stored in a sqlite db and code will be open sourced in event of business closure).
[1] https://photostructure.com/ https://photostructure.com/
- mceachen 5y agoHowdy! I'm the author of PhotoStructure. Hierarchical tags are fundamental to PhotoStructure! Read more here: https://photostructure.com/faq/whats-a-hierarchical-tag/ https://photostructure.com/faq/whats-a-hierarchical-tag/ Any change you make to your assets in the PhotoStructure UI is stored both in your library database as well as either within the file itself using standard EXIF/IPTC headers, or as a standard sidecar format (like .XMP or .MIE), to ensure your work isn't wasted if you migrate to another tool in the future. More details are here: https://photostructure.com/faq/system-of-record/ https://photostructure.com/faq/system-of-record/ I'm happy to field any questions about PhotoStructure or metadata Management in general, either on the forum or on discord (links on the website).