3 ms·
The history of scripting languages is that they were really just a total joy for many C or C++ programmers that were tired of all the minutiae and ritual involv
by BuckRogers 5y ago
The history of scripting languages is that they were really just a total joy for many C or C++ programmers that were tired of all the minutiae and ritual involved with those languages. Many picked one up, usually Perl or to a lesser extent at the time, Python, and enjoyed the heck out of either of them for web development, and scripting out file or text processing tasks.
That origin has really been lost, and people went on to give scripting languages a life of their own.
For me C++ is C#, and while I generally try to apply this language everywhere, my Perl equivalent would probably be Powershell. For some it might be C++ and Ruby, or Rust and Python.
I think there's enough work to be done in this field that there's going to be room for plenty of Python, Javascript, and other scripting language codebases.
New languages are all going to look pretty similar to what came before, because those raised on them are going to borrow elements that they're familiar with. Just like for me how the ideal programming language is or would look a lot like C#. As long as a language fits your technical needs on maintenance and performance grounds, and has the abstractions and keywords to properly express your ideas, it really doesn't matter what it looks like.
- pjmlp 5y agoIf .NET AOT experience had been a proper one, instead of just NGEN, and there wasn't so much politics between WinDev and DevDiv, I bet we would be enjoying it much more on Windows, but so is life, we get COM toys to wrap ourselves to call from .NET instead. I guess they are just helping us to keep our C++ skills up to date. /s