> There can be no separation of money and state, because the state is the only party that could issue money almost by definition. A state is not an atomic enti

> There can be no separation of money and state, because the state is the only party that could issue money almost by definition. A state is not an atomic entity. It’s an abstract object comprised of its citizens. If a part of the population agrees, they may practically form a state even within another state. Think of the mafia, the church or getthos. So crypto enthusiasts may practically form a state (at least as money issuing entity).