I like the exploration of a different execution model over a prolog-like syntax. Even without concurrency as a headline feature, this seems like a good basis fo

I like the exploration of a different execution model over a prolog-like syntax. Even without concurrency as a headline feature, this seems like a good basis for a language's computational model. I always felt like prolog default of executing terms in written-order sacrifices too much power for implementation convenience, which rules out a large well of potential optimizations and generalities. > the order in which these unifications take place is immaterial, any order is fine ... if a logic variable is unbound, then matching a pattern containing such a variable suspends and does not continue until the variable has been bound. > There is no need to artificially orchestrate how the processes execute in parallel, this is done implicitly like the cells of a spreadsheet - once a required result is available, it may trigger further variables to be bound and processes to be resumed, and so on, until the network of processes settles.