> VR beats video conferencing even without any facial tracking In what terms does it "beat it"? I still have Zoom meetings where people just dial-in, have crap

> VR beats video conferencing even without any facial tracking In what terms does it "beat it"? I still have Zoom meetings where people just dial-in, have crappy video, etc. In other words, video conferencing is still being adopted decades after it was introduced. > In VR you multitask by bringing the computing environment into the virtual environment. Multi-tasking isn't a real thing. The overhead from context switching is real and no amount of technology will improve this human deficiency.