3 ms·
Every time these kind of articles come up, either from people for or against the mandates or vaccines, I want to remind everyone that you judge veracity by cons
by thrashh 5y ago
Every time these kind of articles come up, either from people for or against the mandates or vaccines, I want to remind everyone that you judge veracity by considering the circumstances of the source, never the source itself. The exact same words coming from someone working for a cigarette company versus someone working for a renowned research institution cannot be construed in the same way, even if they are the exact same person at two points in time.
Even if they do work for a cigarette company or a research institution, they also have their own biases separate from the organization that they work for.
Their title is only a minor consideration.
- xyzzy21 5y agoHonestly resorting to authority is not that different from listening to an organization with a profit motive to lie.
- t0bia_s 5y agoYes, we should ask basic questions as "How many people do you know personally that was healthy and suddenly die for virus with uknown origin?" or "How many people do you know personally that died or has serious side effects from vaccines?" We shouldn't let media and data etc. think for ourselves.