3 ms·

I argue it's very much in the interest of human beings. It has been since we first picked up a rock and used it has a hammer. It's the ultimate tool and has the

• supperburg 5y ago
  It won’t. You’re wrong.this is the perfect illustration. You think a rock is good therefore AI is good. You’re just unbelievably wrong.
• kafkaIncarnate 5y ago
  Since you two have expressed two very extreme opinions, I would like to express my very bland opinion that this will effectively be the equivalent of when human computers of the early 1900s were replaced with microchips. We adapted, and in this instance the human computers are just propagandists. I believe this will displace the workers of places like the Internet Research Agency and some Marketing specialists. While that accounts for a large percentage of propaganda jobs, that is easy enough to adapt from (nor do I really care given who is generally doing it), and marketing people who I generally don't have respect for either (I mean their founding document is literally titled "Propaganda"). The real marketing pros are good at managing hard to handle talent or bad PR disasters, which are actually meaningful skills that this won't affect. So basically no moral or real consequential impact on society whatsoever.