2 ms·
I kept reading but I did have a "hey, that's kind of unfair" reaction at that line. It's not their fault that the speed of light is a hard limit, eh? There's
by carapace 5y ago
I kept reading but I did have a "hey, that's kind of unfair" reaction at that line. It's not their fault that the speed of light is a hard limit, eh?
There's a chicken and egg problem with compilers and languages on the one side and machines architectures and instruction sets on the other, it's not easy breaking the mold. (GPUs are a counter-example perhaps?)
CPU designers can't all be Ivan Godard ( https://hackaday.com/2013/08/02/the-mill-cpu-architecture/ https://hackaday.com/2013/08/02/the-mill-cpu-architecture/ https://millcomputing.com/ https://millcomputing.com/ ) or Chuck Moore ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_H._Moore#Hardware_design https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_H._Moore#Hardware_desi... http://www.greenarraychips.com/ http://www.greenarraychips.com/ ) eh?
- Syzygies 5y ago> It's not their fault that the speed of light is a hard limit, eh? If you're at Intel, you not likely to see this as a calm period bereft of ideas, while Apple silicon has made such strides. New ideas, or simply a rebalancing of familiar ideas, can make significant progress against the same physics.