Just because the author was intending to get across a certain point, doesn't mean the implementation details aren't worth discussing too. I don't think many peo

Just because the author was intending to get across a certain point, doesn't mean the implementation details aren't worth discussing too. I don't think many people here would disagree with the central point, so what's there to discuss about it? I think it's uncharitable to assume that everyone talking about the implementation details is "missing the point".