3 ms·
Yeah… technically that’s (the solution) normalization, but really not a bad design originally. If you never want a particular atom of data repeated, yes you hav
by bitexploder 5y ago
Yeah… technically that’s (the solution) normalization, but really not a bad design originally. If you never want a particular atom of data repeated, yes you have to normalize each column, and that is efficient in the long run for storage size, but in more normal data storage that still means a lot of joins and you still want indices. On a modern SSD you could use that one table, throw on some indices as you suggest and not notice it again until you hit millions of rows.
Anything you are doing conditional logic or joins on in SQL usually needs some sort of index.