3 ms·
There's a common assumption among crypto-apologists that critics just don't understand cryptocurrency. I don't think that's true. With Bitcoin for example, I co
by ALittleLight 5y ago
There's a common assumption among crypto-apologists that critics just don't understand cryptocurrency. I don't think that's true. With Bitcoin for example, I could whiteboard out how it works and explain it with some technical depth. As a hobby project I once wrote a script to parse the blockchain blocks to get details about specific wallets I was interested in. There are certainly implementation level aspects I don't understand (or know about), but I bet I understand it as well or better than 90+ percent of pro-bitcoin people.
My understanding of Bitcoin doesn't change the fact that it's pretty obviously a Ponzi Scheme. The only way to make money with Bitcoin is selling it to a greater fool. Bitcoin is largely not used for real transactions because it's slow and expensive to transact with. For the typical user, who is concerned with risks like losing their keys, being hacked, or being scammed, Bitcoin is vastly less secure than established banking solutions.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- gonehome 5y agoThis is the best recent write up I’ve found for BTC and I basically agree with it: https://www.matthuang.com/bitcoin_for_the_open_minded_skeptic https://www.matthuang.com/bitcoin_for_the_open_minded_skepti... It sounds like you have a good understanding of the tech, but I’m not sure that’s common on HN. Imo HN mostly dismisses anything new until it’s obviously dominant (sometimes even then).
- pcthrowaway 5y agoBitcoin aside, what do you know about Web3, smart contracts, defi, and decentralized applications? I'm actually in agreement that bitcoin is overvalued, and therefore largely a bubble with ponzi-like elements at this point. But I think the other things mentioned are incredibly nascent emerging technologies whose potential is still largely untapped.