3 ms·
Sometimes even this doesn't work. I used verbatim search and got back results which didn't contain the word I looked for. I then just sadly wonder how the heck
by _nalply 5y ago
Sometimes even this doesn't work. I used verbatim search and got back results which didn't contain the word I looked for.
I then just sadly wonder how the heck this could be possible and resignedly slowly shake my head.
I could wish for a feature where I double-double quote the word to empathically indicate that this word must exist in the result and not left out under any circumstances. But then again I am sure that the search quality will continue to decline and even double-double, triple-quote, quadruple-quote words &c won't help anymore. Sort of a quote inflation.
- b112 5y agoThe + symbol used to mean this, then some lunatic woman from google explained to everyone it had been removed, but it was OK as quotes were the same. She was either a highly incompetent buffoon, or a liar for PR purposes, as quotes are not the same. Why the change? Because it caused issues with Google+ searches from their new fancy pants Facebook clone. Soon after, due to protest, verbatim was introduced. It was fine for at least 5 years, but someone keeps reducing its effectiveness. Clowns. All I hear is clown music, when I Google search. I mean, who rolls out a product so disjointed that the very search for its users is broken, then like a year later, rolls out a broken fix?! Google, that's who. The product failure king.