> As opposed to natural immunity which is proving to be more robust and long lasting. IF your immune system is strong enough and lucky enough to lock to the ap

> As opposed to natural immunity which is proving to be more robust and long lasting. IF your immune system is strong enough and lucky enough to lock to the appropriate parts of the virus. If your immune system doesn't do that, well, you wind up dead. So, yeah, immunity after recovery might be better because the other ones aren't part of your study as they're in a hole in the ground.