4 ms·
> It still has to be proven that this can be done by a startup. I am confused. What, exactly, has to be proven? Startups have already done both things [1] [2].
by theli0nheart 5y ago
> It still has to be proven that this can be done by a startup.
I am confused. What, exactly, has to be proven? Startups have already done both things [1] [2].
(also, correction from my op: s/fission/fusion)
[1]: https://www.helionenergy.com https://www.helionenergy.com
[2]: https://boomsupersonic.com https://boomsupersonic.com
- q-big 5y ago> Startups have already done both things Startups intend to do both things. ;-)
- theli0nheart 5y agoI might be misunderstanding, but hasn't Helion already built prototype reactors, that do produce energy through fusion?
- twarge 5y agoNot more energy than they put in. Just like every other fusion experiment.
- bell-cot 5y agoYou can categorize fusion reactors and experimental / prototype aircraft similarly: (1) "Our engines produce some thrust, and our wings produce some lift". (2) "We managed to take off and land!" (3) A working aircraft - seemingly performant, reliable, and economical enough that actual commercial airlines want to buy it. (4) Like (3), but you've made a bunch of 'em, delivered 'em to airlines, and they're in regular real-word use...without said airlines suffering from buyer's remorse. My understanding is that both Boom Supersonic, and everyone trying to invent a fusion reactor...are all still in category (1).