4 ms·
it would be easier to stomach “apple owns the device not the loser customer” if there was a single major oem who was focused only on producing customer-owned de
by someguydave 5y ago
it would be easier to stomach “apple owns the device not the loser customer” if there was a single major oem who was focused only on producing customer-owned devices
- fsflover 5y agohttps://puri.sm/products https://puri.sm/products
- someguydave 5y agoyeah man do they have data sheets and programming guides for every chip? are they gonna get interoperability with US cell providers?
- fsflover 5y agohttps://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Frequently-Asked-Questions#19-is-the-librem-5-freeopen-hardware https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Freque... https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Cellular-Providers https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Cellul...
- someguydave 5y ago“ It can be debated whether the Librem 5 should be called "free hardware" or "open hardware" since most of the complexity of a smartphone lies within the individual components which are not open hardware. The Librem 5 is free/open hardware in the sense that anyone can take the schematics and legally produce their own versions of the phone, but it isn't free/open hardware in the sense that people can't access the source files for the SoC, cellular modem, WiFi/Bluetooth, GNSS, USB controller, etc., so most of the functionality is hidden.”