3 ms·
The reporter for this article posits a few guesses as to why Walmart dropped the case, but they don't seem interested in trying to understand why Walmart would
by jjeaff 5y ago
The reporter for this article posits a few guesses as to why Walmart dropped the case, but they don't seem interested in trying to understand why Walmart would spend a million dollars to fight a $7k fine in the first place.
My guess is that like a lot of cases like this, they are trying to keep a precedent from being set. Once you have been fined successfully for a specific thing, getting fined for similar acts later is a no brainer.
But what doesn't make sense to me in this case is why Walmart would be worried about this particular issue. It's not like they foresee a future where hundreds or thousands of employees get trampled by shoppers. Even in some nightmare scenario, it would take a lot of the $7k maximum fine to even make a dent for their bottom line.
I would be curious what their internal thinking is on this. Perhaps it was just a result of a bureaucratic rule to always contest. Or maybe it was a personal vendetta by Walmart attorneys against some OSHA employees.
- vkou 5y ago> Even in some nightmare scenario, it would take a lot of the $7k maximum fine to even make a dent for their bottom line. A fine sticking is ammunition for a wrongful death civil suit. The average cost per death will exceed $7,000. Which would be a pretty strong incentive to not kill people.
- laurent92 5y agoTrue. But again, since if I understand lives of Americans are counted as their worth in salary, Walmart also will be happy to keep low salaries.