> Also, not deterministic > not deterministic perf wise. was what parent wrote (emphasis added), I assume referring to the problem that when an object is dest

> Also, not deterministic > not deterministic perf wise. was what parent wrote (emphasis added), I assume referring to the problem that when an object is destroyed, an arbitrarily large number of other objects -- a subset of the first object's members, recursively -- may need to be destroyed as a consequence.