3 ms·
> the systemic realities are nonetheless a very real problem. If you have data/industry experience in support of this, I am genuinely interested to hear about
by jacobobryant 5y ago
> the systemic realities are nonetheless a very real problem.
If you have data/industry experience in support of this, I am genuinely interested to hear about it, otherwise it seems like a case of my anecdote against your anecdote. It is not clear to me as a layperson that spam misclassification is indeed that big of a problem.
- cbsmith 5y agohttps://www.sitepoint.com/spam-roi-profit-on-1-in-125m-response-rate/ https://www.sitepoint.com/spam-roi-profit-on-1-in-125m-respo...
- cbsmith 5y agoIn terms of industry data, spam filters are generally seen as effective with about 99% effective, though Google has claimed they've achieved about 99.9% efficacy in the last few years, though there's some question as to how they are measuring that. The problem is, even at 99.9% efficacy, with around 50% of all e-mail being spam (that number used to be much higher, and there's some question as to whether the drop to 50% is a trend or a reflection of failures to detect/identify), that's still a lot of spam getting through.