3 ms·
The WP article explains that it was just to work around a bill forbidding surface rail on that route.
by fulafel 5y ago
The WP article explains that it was just to work around a bill forbidding surface rail on that route.
- mst 5y agoThat might have been why they decided to do it but the question of return-on-investment in terms of infrastructure costs is still interesting and doesn't really depend on the underlying motivation for the choice.