> I didn't say anything about what Wikipedia should and shouldn't say. Well, of course you did, didn't you? I thought you said in your original comment that s

> I didn't say anything about what Wikipedia should and shouldn't say. Well, of course you did, didn't you? I thought you said in your original comment that saying certain things indicated wikipedia was politically aligned, and you wouldn't like them to be politically aligned. That's what I was trying to get more info about, what sorts of utterances you thought indicated or led to an inappropriate political alignment for wikipedia. I think? Am I misunderstanding? These conversations often somehow do seem like we're speaking different languages, that's why I was trying to get clarification. I'm not following the grammar of "companies and organiations should expect simultaneously annoying and encourage different groups whenever they support movements that seem in their name or basic statement to be fair or innocuous like this", I lost the meaning of that sentence, sorry. Missing a word maybe? I agree there are interesting questions here.