230 could be limited to apply only if content creators are natural persons and accredited academic institutions*. There should be no inhibition for natural pers

230 could be limited to apply only if content creators are natural persons and accredited academic institutions*. There should be no inhibition for natural persons to share information and their opinions. However, incorporated content producers are often fronts for political parties, wealthy private donators and foreign actors to amplify their opinion. They are quite resourceful and influental already and don't need further amplification by allowing social networks and news aggregators to share their content for them. Edit: The term "academic institutions" should be understood to also include government archives open to the public and content from museums and the like.