You don't think setting out a dichotomy of either "being a billionaire" or "not having any money" is a just a tad narrow-minded? Sure, tangible steps are nice.

You don't think setting out a dichotomy of either "being a billionaire" or "not having any money" is a just a tad narrow-minded? Sure, tangible steps are nice. Even hobbyist billionaire architects are capable of taking tangible steps because it's quite a low bar to clear. I do find it a bit ridiculous that you call any opposition to the plan "unrealistic", as though Munger is the only architect in the world who can save UCSB from its housing problem.