2 ms·
And in the meantime we continued to use fossil fuels. TMI had little to no impact on the environment and public. Chernobyl was the result of a corrupt politic
by throw0101a 5y ago
And in the meantime we continued to use fossil fuels.
TMI had little to no impact on the environment and public.
Chernobyl was the result of a corrupt political system which skimped on safety (e.g., no containment building/vessel) because of costs—something that isn't present in any developed country.
That leaves Fukushima.
I'll take the low odds of maybe one incident in 60+ years of industry over the certainty of climate change. And I say this as someone who lives 50km from a nuclear power plant.
- cinntaile 5y agoCorruption is still a big problem all over the world, if that was the cause then you're arguing against more nuclear buildout.
- wongarsu 5y agoIf the impact of the coal industry wasn't so gradual but was released in a sudden event every 10-20 years, we would outlaw coal mining, with prison times for anyone who burns it. But with the impact being diffuse in time and space, we don't really mind. It's the same effect as nobody caring that deaths from car crashes in the US increased by 3000 people between 2019 and 2020, but kill 3000 people at once and it's a tragedy that will be remembered for decades. Our skewed perception of threats is maybe one of the most destructive psychological quirks of humanity. It makes fighting gradual events like climate change or disease outbreaks incredibly difficult.