> Ask a newspaper to do a small article about it, interviewing him Per general notability guidelines, a brief article isn't likely to help a case for a separat

> Ask a newspaper to do a small article about it, interviewing him Per general notability guidelines, a brief article isn't likely to help a case for a separate wiki page [0]. Per low-key, may be there's a case to be made [1], though there's also concerns around advocacy [2]. > and taking a really nice photo of him- which can go on the wiki page. To get a photo on wikimedia you own, upload it any where (preferably flickr / straight up on commons.wikimedia) and release it under a wikimedia-compatible license [Ex A] > It doesn't make up for the problem, but it is something they can do, at no cost to anyone, and it would make a difference. Wikipedia has its warts, and the community is pretty open about what it means to have an article on there and why it may not be the best thing for anyone that's famous [3]. Wikipedia favours verifiability over truth [4], and is not bothered with incorrect information [5], because someone somewhere ought to eventually correct it [6]. (And of course, I am wiki-lawyering at this point [7]) -- [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:GNG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:GNG [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:LOWKEY https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:LOWKEY [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SOAPBOX https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SOAPBOX [Ex A] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bradfitz-sunglasses.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bradfitz-sunglasses.... [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:FAMOUS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:FAMOUS [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:VNT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:VNT [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS [6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:IMPERFECT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:IMPERFECT [7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:LAWYER https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:LAWYER